Dilemma between Fraud and Tax Compliance at Government Agencies
Abstract
Fraud in government agencies is very interesting to discuss because of the breadth of the parties with an interest in government agencies. This study aims to reveal the essence of financial management in a government agency in the Madura region regarding the dilemma of fraud in tax compliance enforcement. This research method uses qualitative methods with a transcendental phenomenological approach. The research findings reveal the dilemma faced by financial managers in committing expenditure manipulation fraud as a form of tax compliance enforcement. The essence of state or regional financial management that is peppered with this dilemma is a necessity experienced by financial managers of a government agency. It is hoped that this research will be able to provide an overview of financial management in government agencies from different sides, so that improvements to regulations and policies on state or regional financial management can be realized.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ACFE. (2020). Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse: 2020 Global Fraud Study. In Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE).
ACFE Indonesia Chapter. (2020). Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019. In Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE) Indonesia Chapter.
Adekoya, A. A., Oyebamiji, T. A., & Lawal, A. B. (2020). Forensic Accounting, Tax Fraud and Tax Evasion in Nigeria – Review of Literatures and Matter for Policy Consideration. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences, 9(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.20448/2001.91.21.28
Calafato, A., B, C. C., & Pace, G. J. (2016). A Controlled Natural Language for Tax Fraud Detection. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41498-0
Creswell, J., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative Inguiry Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. In SAGE Publications (Vol. 53, Issue 9).
Farrar, J., Hausserman, C., & Rennie, M. (2019). The Influence of Revenge and Financial Rewards on Tax Fraud Reporting Intentions. Journal of Economic Psychology, 71, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2018.10.005
Hidayatulloh, A. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mendorong Wajib Pajak Pribadi Untuk Menggelapkan Pajak. Optimum: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 6(2), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.12928/optimum.v6i2.7879
Ibadin, P. O., & Kemebradikemor, E. (2020). Tax Fraud in Nigeria: A Review of Causal Factors. Journal of Taxation and Economic Development, 19(1), 64–80.
Indriani, N., Alim, M. N., & Haryadi, B. (2019). The Fraud Portrait in Budget Planning by the Regional Government Apparatus. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 22(1), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.14414/jebav.v22i1.1374
Inkiriwang, K. G. (2017). Perspektif Hukum Terhadap Upaya Penghindaran Pajak oleh Suatu Badan Usaha. Lex Et Societatis, 5(4), 13–18.
Kamal, M. (2018). Penilaian Likelihood Risiko Fraud dalam Manajemen Pemerintah. Jurnal Liquidity, 7(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32546/lq.v7i1.176
Mangoting, Y., Sukoharsono, E. G., Rosidi, & Nurkholis. (2017). Menguak Dimensi Kecurangan Pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 8(2), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2017.08.7054
Manossoh, H. (2016). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Fraud pada Pemerintah di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Jurnal EMBA, 4(1), 484–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v4i1.11649
Nurfadila. (2020). Pengaruh Keadilan, Sistem Perpajakan, Kualitas Pelayanan, dan Terdeteksinya Kecurangan Terhadap Penggelapan Pajak Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Madya Makassar. Celebes Equilibrum Journal, 1(2), 44–53.
Rad, M. S., & Shahbahrami, A. (2016). High Performance Implementation of Tax Fraud Detection Algorithm. 2015 Signal Processing and Intelligent Systems Conference, SPIS 2015, 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/SPIS.2015.7422302
Rus, M. I. (2019). Tax Evasion Vs. Fiscal Fraud. Fiat Iustitia, 0(2), 144–148.
Saxunova, D., & Szarkova, R. (2017). Tax Management Hierarchy – Tax Fraud and a Fraudster. Management International Conference, 633–644. http://www.hippocampus.si/ISBN/978-961-7023-71-8/236.pdf
Schonenberg, I. (2020). Intelligent Tax Fraud Detection. Bachelor Thesis Economie & Informatica Tilburg University.
Setiawan, A. R. (2019). “Malo” dan Penegakan Karakter Kejujuran: Tafsir Budaya(wan) Madura atas “Sisi Gelap” Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 14(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2019.v14.i02.p10
Setiawan, A. R., Irianto, G., & Achsin, M. (2013). System-Driven (un) Fraud: Tafsir Aparatur Terhadap “Sisi Gelap” Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma (JAMAL), 4(April), 85–100. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2013.04.7184
Shafer, W. E., Simmons, R. S., & Yip, R. W. Y. (2016). Social Responsibility, Professional Commitment and Tax Fraud. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2014-1620
Sholihah, S., Alim, M. N., & Musyarofah, S. (2016). Memotret Pola Fraud pada Rincian Objek Belanja yang Menjadi Temuan BPK. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting (JAFFA), 04(2), 101–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21107/jaffa.v4i2.2783
Sholihah, S., & Prasetyono. (2016). Fraud Pelaporan Keuangan Sektor Publik. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting (JAFFA), 04(1), 53–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21107/jaffa.v4i1.1882
Stankevicius, E., & Leonas, L. (2015). Hybrid Approach Model for Prevention of Tax Evasion and Fraud. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 383–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.555
Sumuan, C. F., & Fidiana, F. (2020). Tax Sanctions from the Authority Perspective. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 15(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2020.v15.i01.p10
Suprapti, E. (2017). Pengaruh Tekanan Keuangan Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. Jurnal Reviu Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 7(2), 1013. https://doi.org/10.22219/jrak.v7i2.15
Syahrina, D., Irianto, G., & Prihatiningtyas, Y. W. (2017). Budaya Cari Untung Sebagai Pemicu Terjadinya Fraud: Sebuah Studi Etnografi. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pendidikan (Assets), 6(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.25273/jap.v6i1.1294
Tjondro, E., Patuli, L., Andrianto, R., & Julitha, D. (2020). Tax Authority Versus Peer Communication: The Influence of Trust, Service Climate, and Voluntary Cooperation. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 15(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.24843/jiab.2020.v15.i01.p06
Vanhoeyveld, J., Martens, D., & Peeters, B. (2020). Value-Added Tax Fraud Detection with Scalable Anomaly Detection Techniques. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 86(105895), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105895
Widuri, R., Jevera, I., & Zerlinda, J. (2019). Tax Fraud Reporting: The Effect of Envious Motive and Financial Reward. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 103, 89–94. https://doi.org/10.2991/teams-19.2019.13
Winarsih, E. (2018). Pengaruh Sistem Perpajakan, Kualitas Pelayanan dan Terdeteksinya Kecurangan Terhadap Penggelapan Pajak. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 1(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33096/atestasi.v1i1.55
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.